More Than a Question of Winning and Losing - Darren C. Treasure, Ph.D.
I
once played soccer with a kid named
Mark. Mark was a very successful
youth soccer player who was always
one of his team's better players.
Indeed, Mark represented the national
schoolboy U-15 team. About one
year later, however, Mark dropped
out of soccer. He said that soccer
had stopped being fun, as he wasn't
the best player anymore. It was
clear that Mark could only feel
successful if he was number one
and did not want to play if he
could not achieve this goal.
This anecdote illustrates how important it
is for coaches and/or parents to understand
the ways in which their players perceive
success in soccer, and the significant effects
these perceptions may have on their motivation
to play the game. Specifically, how hard
they try in practice and during games, whether
they persist when the going gets tough, and
whether they practice skills that will help
them get better even if they are not presently
very good at them.
Research has found that for children under
the age of 10, high ability is generally
implied by learning or by success at tasks
they are uncertain of being able to complete.
They do not judge ability with reference
to performance norms or social comparisons.
They can be induced to adopt another's performance
as a standard, but normally they make self-referenced
rather than social norm-referenced judgments
of ability. For young children, when more
effort is needed for success, this implies
more learning which means more ability in
their world.
In a real sense, effort is ability for children
under the age of 11. Because young children
cannot differentiate effort from ability,
they do not have the cognitive ability to
understand winning and losing. If you do
not believe me, go watch any under-9 game
and listen to the first question a child
asks as he or she comes off of the field.
If it is not "Where's my snack?",
it will be, "Did we win?" The child
at this age understands that winning is important,
loves to compete, but does not understand
winning and losing in any systematic sense.
Because of this, they will not feel sad until
a parent or coach informs them that they
lost and accompany this information with
a positive or negative emotional reaction.
Around the age of 11-12 years, however, children
develop the capacity to differentiate ability
from effort and now understand that effort
can only help their performance up to their
current level of ability. For example, at
this age a slow player recognizes that no
matter how hard they try, they will not out-run
the fastest player on the team. As a consequence
of this developmental change, after the age
of 11-12, individuals can choose to define
success in two different ways, namely in
a childlike fashion in which improvement
and effort are critical, or a more adult
way in which outperforming others is stressed.
These different ways of perceiving success
manifest themselves in an individual's task
or ego goal orientation. Ego-oriented individuals
perceive success in terms of winning and
outperforming others, and believe that if
they outperform someone with minimum effort
they have demonstrated an even higher level
of perceived ability. These individuals believe
that success is determined by ability and
that cheating and deception may be acceptable
behaviors if they enable them to achieve
their goal of winning.
In contrast, task-oriented individuals perceive
success in terms of getting better and trying
hard. Research has demonstrated that task-oriented
individuals will remain motivated even in
times of adversity, for example when they
are losing, as they perceive success in terms
of trying hard and attempting to improve.
For example, the center forward who misses
a few chances will continue to run into space
in the attacking third of the field and accept
the responsibility of taking shots at goal.
Ego-oriented individuals who are successful
are likely to engage in the same positive
behaviors. However, when ego-oriented individuals
begin to doubt their ability they are likely
to begin to withdraw effort and engage in
negative behaviors to protect their perceived
soccer ability.
For example, you may find ego-oriented forwards
drifting further and further back after they
have missed a few chances. They may explain
this by stating that they want to "create
from the back," or begin to blame their
teammates for their inability to get the
ball to them in the attacking third of the
field.
Although this behavior may seem illogical
to you, it makes perfect sense to the player
as they are attempting to preserve their
now fragile perception of ability. After
a while it could be that these ego-oriented
individuals who doubt their perceived ability,
much like my friend Mark, choose to drop
out of soccer all together as it no longer
provides them the opportunity to feel successful
as they do not achieve their goal of being
the best compared to others.
In an activity in which performance during
childhood and early adolescence is so closely
linked to physiological, motor skill, cognitive
and other psycho-social developmental issues,
it seems sensible, to promote task orientation.
By emphasizing outcome and winning (ego orientation),
less mature children are likely to make inappropriate
perceived ability assessments when the demonstration
of high ability is restricted to those children
who are currently the top performers.
Small children who struggle to compete against
their bigger, quicker peers may choose to
drop out of soccer prematurely because winning
is the only way they can feel successful.
In addition, task orientation should be fostered
with those children who are currently the
top age group performers. Why is this important?
As in other activities, children move from
one soccer team to another, from one
level to another, and from one age group
to another. When this occurs it is unlikely
that the hierarchy of ability within the
respective context will remain constant.
In such instances, if the demonstration of
ability is continually based on the comparison
of ability to others, an individual's perception
of high ability may weaken which may lead
to maladapted behaviors, including, potentially,
withdrawal from the game.
From a motivational perspective, therefore,
it is important that we as parents and coaches
attempt to promote task orientation in our
young players. By providing ways of defining
success other than winning, we can ensure
that our players remain motivated throughout
their soccer career. Research with elite
level athletes has shown that these individuals
are high in both ego and task orientation.
They feel successful when they win and outperform
their competitors, but they also appreciate
the fact that this may not always be possible.
There may be occasions when they lose and/or
perform badly and in these times of adversity
it is important that they view success in
terms other than outcome if they are to remain
motivated.
The issue remains, however, of how to enhance
the motivation of our players by encouraging
the development of task orientation. Research
has shown that the parent and/or coach is
critical in the active construction of a
child's perception of what is valued in the
youth soccer context. Parents and coaches
should critically evaluate what they do and
how they do it in terms of task and ego goals.
For example, how do you define success for
your players? Is it in terms of development
and effort, or winning and losing? Do you
design practice sessions that challenge your
players which will lead to development, or
do they repeat well learned skills that,
although, increasing the probability of winning,
may delay development? How do you evaluate
performance? What behaviors do you consider
desirable? Do you congratulate players when
they win and outperform others or when they
try hard and improve? How do you react when
the team wins or loses?
Persuasive evidence exists to suggest that
by making certain cues, rewards, and expectations
salient a parent or coach can encourage a
particular goal orientation and in so doing
affect the way a child perceives the soccer
experience. If we are to ensure that all
youth soccer players are optimally motivated
coaches should, therefore, work hard to establish
an environment that promotes task goals:
a developmentally appropriate environment
in which children are evaluated on their
skill development and effort and not their
comparative performance and ability.
Darren C. Treasure, Ph.D., is an adjunct
faculty member of the United States Soccer
Federation national coaching staff and is
an assistant professor of sport and exercise
psychology at Arizona State University. This
article originally appeared in U.S. Soccer
Magazine. For a two-year subscription (eight
issues), send a check for $20 to U.S. Soccer
Magazine, 1801 South Prairie Avenue, Chicago,
Illinois 60616.
©
Cutters Soccer Club Home • About
Us • Contact Us 812.333.8010
Hosted by Kiva • your
privacy